↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Comparison of peer-led versus professional-led training in basic life support for medical students

Overview of attention for article published in Advances in Medical Education and Practice, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of peer-led versus professional-led training in basic life support for medical students
Published in
Advances in Medical Education and Practice, July 2011
DOI 10.2147/amep.s22948
Pubmed ID
Authors

Takashi Fujiwara, Mai Nishimura, Ryoko Honda, Takashi Nishiyama, Masahiro Nomoto, Naoto Kobayashi, Masayuki Ikeda

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 60 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 16%
Researcher 9 15%
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Other 5 8%
Other 11 18%
Unknown 11 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 48%
Psychology 10 16%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Sports and Recreations 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 15 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2018.
All research outputs
#20,963,058
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Medical Education and Practice
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,823
of 127,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Medical Education and Practice
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.5. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,920 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them