↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Pseudomonas aeruginosa ventilator-associated pneumonia management

Overview of attention for article published in Infection and Drug Resistance, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
104 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
205 Mendeley
Title
Pseudomonas aeruginosa ventilator-associated pneumonia management
Published in
Infection and Drug Resistance, January 2016
DOI 10.2147/idr.s50669
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sergio Ramírez-Estrada, Bárbara Borgatta, Jordi Rello

Abstract

Ventilator-associated pneumonia is the most common infection in intensive care unit patients associated with high morbidity rates and elevated economic costs; Pseudomonas aeruginosa is one of the most frequent bacteria linked with this entity, with a high attributable mortality despite adequate treatment that is increased in the presence of multiresistant strains, a situation that is becoming more common in intensive care units. In this manuscript, we review the current management of ventilator-associated pneumonia due to P. aeruginosa, the most recent antipseudomonal agents, and new adjunctive therapies that are shifting the way we treat these infections. We support early initiation of broad-spectrum antipseudomonal antibiotics in present, followed by culture-guided monotherapy de-escalation when susceptibilities are available. Future management should be directed at blocking virulence; the role of alternative strategies such as new antibiotics, nebulized treatments, and vaccines is promising.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 204 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 29 14%
Student > Postgraduate 21 10%
Student > Master 19 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 8%
Other 15 7%
Other 39 19%
Unknown 65 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 19 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 5%
Other 21 10%
Unknown 75 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2016.
All research outputs
#3,979,917
of 22,844,985 outputs
Outputs from Infection and Drug Resistance
#131
of 1,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,444
of 393,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Infection and Drug Resistance
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,844,985 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,655 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,571 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them