↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for depression: trends and developments

Overview of attention for article published in Psychology Research and Behavior Management, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#13 of 726)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
17 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
342 Mendeley
Title
Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for depression: trends and developments
Published in
Psychology Research and Behavior Management, May 2016
DOI 10.2147/prbm.s63949
Pubmed ID
Authors

Meagan B MacKenzie, Nancy L Kocovski

Abstract

Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) was developed as a psychological intervention for individuals at risk of depressive relapse. Possible mechanisms of change for this intervention are in line with its theoretical underpinnings, and include increases in mindfulness and/or decreases in negative repetitive thoughts. This review provides an overview of current trends in MBCT research, including efficacy and questions regarding the specific effects of MBCT in light of recent comparisons with structurally equivalent control conditions, mechanisms of change, and moderators of treatment outcome. In addition, future directions are discussed, such as challenges with training an adequate number of therapists and disseminating this therapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 342 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 339 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 64 19%
Student > Master 61 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 8%
Researcher 24 7%
Student > Postgraduate 17 5%
Other 46 13%
Unknown 103 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 130 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 6%
Social Sciences 16 5%
Neuroscience 11 3%
Other 37 11%
Unknown 108 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 103. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2022.
All research outputs
#400,345
of 25,026,088 outputs
Outputs from Psychology Research and Behavior Management
#13
of 726 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,324
of 304,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychology Research and Behavior Management
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,026,088 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 726 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,354 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.