| Title |
Effects of different resistance training frequencies on flexibility in older women
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Interventions in Aging, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.2147/cia.s77433 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nelson H Carneiro, Alex S Ribeiro, Matheus A Nascimento, Luís A Gobbo, Brad J Schoenfeld, Abdallah Achour Júnior, Sebastião Gobbi, Arli R Oliveira, Edilson S Cyrino |
| Abstract |
The main purpose of the investigation reported here was to analyze the effect of resistance training (RT) performed at different weekly frequencies on flexibility in older women. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 234 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 232 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 49 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 6% |
| Professor | 14 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 43 | 18% |
| Unknown | 67 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 81 | 35% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 24 | 10% |
| Unknown | 77 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2021.
All research outputs
#6,997,226
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#653
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,102
of 270,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#15
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,992 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.